Introduction to Palo Mayombe


Brief Introduction to Palo Mayombe

Palo Mayombe is an African (BaKongo) derived religion which has been practiced for centuries throughout Cuba. Although it has African roots it is an inclusive religion that has been altered from its original form found in the BaKongo region of Africa, particularly Zaire and Angola. Many of the remains from the original practices have been preserved and written about by great scholars such as Robert Farris Thompson, and McGaffey. It has been labeled as idolatry and fetishism, a fascination with objects believed to have spiritual powers, often called minkisi (plural for nkisi). Palo Mayombe has become as misunderstood as Vodoun, another religion with BaKongo influence and has even come to be labeled as Satanism. This is very unfortunate since these African derived religions are full of astounding philosophies concerning life, death, the view of the universe and are made up of many intricate ceremonies that have been passed on for hundreds of years.

In the early 1500’s many slaves were captured from the regions mentioned above and taken to Cuba and Brazil. Their religious practices that were preserved in Cuba came to be known as Palo Mayombe. Although Catholic/Christian oppression made it almost impossible for the slaves to keep their religion alive they managed to do so. The use of herbs and sticks is essential to the practice of Mayombe (thus the word Palo being used since Palo means stick in Spanish). The familiar and warm climate of Cuba along with the many herbs that grew there made it possible for the slaves to keep their religion intact. Also, a growing interest from the natives allowed a certain amount of tolerance.

The practitioners are automatically priests or priestesses of Palo Mayombe and are called as Tata or Yaya, the literal translation of father and mother. They also are known as Ganguleros, Paleros and Paleras. They are the ones that perform the initiation ceremony and have the secrets to cure and to manipulate spirits for their benefit. BaKongo practices survived the slave trade and the religion proved to be inclusive and allowed much influence from other religions and tribes such as Christianity from the slave masters, Islam from the Mandingo people of Senegal and Orisha of the Yoruba people of Nigeria. An example of this inclusiveness is the use of the greeting Salamalekun. Salamalekun is a common greeting among Muslims and was borrowed from the Senegalese slaves.

Also the influence of Catholicism is clearly illustrated in the use of the crucifix. Mayombe’s transformation is even seen in the use of language. Unlike the Yorubas which arrived to Cuba much later (approx. 200-300 yrs. later) who were able to maintain their language almost in its entirety. Mayomberos on the other hand speak a mix of Spanish and Bantu.

The structure of Mayombe in Cuba transformed into what became known as ramas/branches. Each branch was formed because different tribes of the BaKongo had different ways of practicing, although all were similar, some secrets belonged to certain tribes. Those tribes became ramas or branched of Mayombe and they were formed and given names, such as; Briyumba, Vititi Congo, Mayaca, Corta Lima, Monte Tiene Garabato, Acaba Mundo and more. Each line has similarities and differences. Differences regarding practice such as initiation and some have been influenced more by some cultures that the BaKongo have encountered than others.



The History of Baphomet

The History of the Origin of the Sigil of Baphomet

and its Use

in the Church of Satan

Sigil of Baphomet

have been many rumors and claims regarding this symbol, and here we recount
the Church of Satan’s discovery and use of this powerful image.

to the worldwide press given the Church of Satan—and later the publication
of The Satanic Bible
the now familiar goat / pentagram / “Leviathan” graphic had not
been used as the prime symbol for Satanism. Our younger readers may find this
hard to believe, but it is a fact.

Examine the literature
and imagery predating the founding of the Church of Satan in 1966: Satanism
is usually denoted by inverted crosses or crucifixes and blasphemous parodies
of Christian art. There are also images of goats and devils, and demons—along
with their sigils from grimoires—all used to represent the “satanic.”
However, the complete graphic which we now call the “Sigil of Baphomet”
only became associated as the foremost symbol of Satanism in the public and
media consciousness after the founding of the Church of Satan and Dr. LaVey’s
use of it. From its inception, the Church of Satan has been constantly spotlighted
in print, film, and television media all over the globe, so this was to be

The word “Baphomet”
dates back to records of Templar trials, and there are ongoing discussions
concerning its derivation and meaning. However, there is no clear evidence
that the symbol which we in the Church of Satan call “Baphomet”
is similarly derived; the evidence, if any, has not yet been released in any
public forum.

The Unholy Genesis of the Sigil of Baphomet

A discussion
concerning the symbolism of pentagrams is contained in Eliphas Lévi’s
Dogme et Rituel de la haute magie (1855-56 & 61, translated into
English by A. E. Waite under the title Transcendental Magic). There
are no accompanying illustrations. Here is the English translation of the

Chapter 5—The
Blazing Pentagram

The Pentagram,
which in Gnostic schools is called the Blazing Star, is the sign of intellectual
omnipotence and autocracy. It is the Star of the Magi; it is the sign of
the Word made flesh; and, according to the direction of its points, this
absolute magical symbol represents order or confusion, the Divine Lamb of
Ormuz and St. John, or the accursed goat of Mendes. It is initiation or
profanation; it is Lucifer or Vesper, the star of morning or evening. It
is Mary or Lilith, victory or death, day or night. The Pentagram with two
points in the ascendant represents Satan as the goat of the Sabbath; when
one point is in the ascendant, it is the sign of the Saviour. By placing
it in such a manner that two of its points are in the ascendant and one
is below, we may see the horns, ears and beard of the hierarchic Goat of
Mendes, when it becomes the sign of infernal evocations.

pentagram or pentalpha is a symbol which has long been affiliated with
demonic activity. From at least the early Middle Ages an entire
genre of ritual magic handbooks and manuals has claimed to originate
from King Solomon based, no doubt, on his legendary reputation for
conjuring and employing demons in the construction of his temple. Among
the oldest of these grimoires is the Testament of Solomon dating
from perhaps as early as the First Century BC. This text includes
a diagram of the pentalpha and relates that Solomon had a ring inscribed
with that symbol which gave to him the ability to call forth demons
and to have them work his will. The image in the manuscript shows
the star point up. Inscribed on a ring however, the direction
of the point might be immaterial as it could be perceived either way.

What was the
source for this symbolism presented by Lévi in this work? Scholars
researching the sources for his writings might be able to trace this.

As far as we
now know, the first printed artwork for an image of a goat face in a five-pointed
star appeared in an
engraving on page 387 of the 1897 book La Clef de la Magie Noire, by
French nobleman and occultist Stanislas de Guaita. The book was part of
his multi-volume Essais de Sciences Maudites which not only
put forth some of his own occult ideas underlying his establishment of
a group of Rosicrucians but also served as a platform for his share of
the accusations of Satanism that he and his enemies—such as La
Bas author
J.K. Huysmans and friends—were publicly throwing at each other at
the time. De
Guaita wrote that he considered Eliphas Lévi to be one of the greatest
geniuses of the 19th century so it is not surprising that he would take
one of Lévi’s concepts and embellish it further.

Lévi mentions
the demon Lilith in the above passage and the de Guaita image incorporates
her name into the graphic along with that of Samael. In different
places Lévi calls Samael both a white-light genie of Mars as
well as the Hebrew name for a demonic force. Lévi makes no
mention of Leviathan but the de Guaita image is encirlced by this
name in Hebrew script.

In describing
the graphic, de Guaita only slightly expands on Lévi
and says nothing about Samael, Lilith, or Leviathan. After describing
the point-up pentagram as a white-light symbol of man “voluntarily
rejoined in the providential plan,” de Guaita notes:

But oriented
in the opposite direction, the pentagrammatic Star is nothing more than
a symbol of iniquity, perdition, blasphemy: its two points in the air
become the horns of the foul Goat threatening Heaven, and whose head
is framed with the stellar pentacle, with its low ears in the side branches,
and its beard in disorder in the single lower point. [Page 386]

This engraving
may have been taken from elsewhere or it may have been created by de
Guaita’s secretary and assistant Oswald Wirth as noted below.

description can also be seen as a clear influence in Paul Jagot’s
Occulte et Magie Pratique
Editions Drouin, 1924, page #172). As can be seen below, it is
figure number 24 and is labeled “the pentagram espressive of subversion.”
How the author came by this image is unknown to us. Note as well that the
star itself is “open,” rather than composed of five “alphas.”

Proto-Baphomet found in Jagot.

Next we find
on page 47 of the Handbook
of Magic & Witchcraft by Charles W. Olliver (Rider & Co.,
London, 1928) an appropriation from La Clef de la Magie Noire.
book is highly derivative of prior works and it is clear that he simply
lifted the images from de Guaita, subtracting the surrounding circles
and Hebrew characters.

Olliver: Black Magic Pentagram

is referred to in the text as the “Inverted Pentagram of Black Magic,”
and is coupled with the “Pentagram of Appolonius,” shown below.

Olliver: Pentagram of Appolonius

continued evolution of this goat-graphic can be found in a 1931 book concerning
Freemasonry by Oswald Wirth (Oswald Wirth, La Franc-Maçonnerie Rendue
Intelligible à ces Adeptes, Deuxième Partie: “Le Compagnon
Paris: Derry-Livres, 1931, page #60).

Wirth Pentagram

addition to creating illustrations for de Guaita,
Wirth also wrote and illustrated a number of his own books on occult
topics including the tarot and Freemasonry. His tarot deck is still sold
commercially today. In
Franc-Maçonnerie Rendue Intelligible à ces Adeptes, Deuxième
Partie: “Le Compagnon
presented his own original rendering
of the goat head and pentagram image and identified it as his own by
discretely including his “OW” initials just above the goat’s

unadulterated de Guaita images re-appeared in a
book by Maurice Bessy: A Pictorial History of Magic and the Supernatural (English
first edition 1964, French first edition: Histoire en 1000 Images de
la Magie
Editions du Pont Royal, 1961).

Bessy Interior Pentagrams

graphic image in the Bessy book (English edition, page 198 under the heading
“Satanic Sciences”) has a caption which reads:

Pentagrams are the result of obscure numerological speculations. The five-pointed
star, for example, seems to be characteristic of the Christian era, while
the cross is the symbol (amongst others) of the figure five: four arms
and the centre. By a strange coincidence, the Holy Spirit, the United
States, and the U.S.S.R. and Islam use the fivepointed star as their emblem.
(The opposition of good and evil is indicated through the inverted triangles).”

The above illustration
is to the right of this caption. As in all prior appearances of this and
similar renderings, nowhere in this book is #625 referred to as “The
Sigil of Baphomet.”

For the actual
cover of this hard-bound book, an artist rendered symbol #625, minus the
“Lilith” and “Samael,” and it was printed in white on
the black cloth cover. It is very striking.

Bessy Cover Pentagram

During his
years of research into the “Black Arts,” Anton LaVey had come
across this book and added it to his collection. So when he chose to metamorphose
his magic circle, “The Order of the Trapezoid,” into the Church
of Satan, he decided that this particular symbol was the one which most
fully embodied the principles which were the bedrock of the first aboveground
Satanic church.

The pentagram
(pentalpha) comes from the Pythagorean tradition. The goat’s or ram’s
head within it refers to the Goat of Mendes, a symbol of the Egyptian Neter
Amon, who was called “the hidden one, he who abides in all things, the
soul of all phenomena” and is thus the closest Neter to the Dark Force
which is seen to permeate and motivate all nature. The two concentric circles
which contain the word “Leviathan” written in Hebrew (starting at
the lowermost point and moving counterclockwise) stem from the traditions
of the Ophite (serpent) Jews, and this is the essence of the Dragon of the
Abyss, descended from Tiamat, sometimes symbolized as an ouroboros (serpent
biting its own tail forming a circle). Thus, in one sigil, we find a confluence
of several cultures’ approach to embodying what we call Satan.

Tombstone Table TableauIt
is this cover art which was enlarged and placed above the altar in the main
ritual chamber (as well as above a lower-level altar) in the infamous Black

That the original
source for this symbol was the Maurice Bessy book was well-known among the
members who attended rituals at the Black House during our formative years.
The book was constantly being perused by them, and was often used as a prop
in photo shoots (minus the dust jacket which did not include this symbol).
Anton LaVey never claimed to have designed the Bessy version of this
symbol (as falsely stated by some of our detractors).

In its early
days, the Church of Satan used the version seen on the cover of the Bessy
book on its membership cards and stationery as well as on the medallions which
were created both by hand and by professional manufacturers. Indeed, there
were many variations, based on the skill of the renderers as well as on the
resolution for detail of the means used to create the final product.

While The
Satanic Bible
was being written, it was decided that a unique version
of this symbol must be rendered to be identified exclusively with the Church
of Satan. The pentagram was made geometrically precise, the two circles perfect,
the Hebrew characters were distorted to make them look more sharply serpentine
and “corrupted with time,” while the goat face was redrawn with
particular attention paid toward the eyes. The original highly-detailed artwork
was first used to create altar plaques which were available only to local
Church of Satan members (later, in February of 1970, they were made available
to the general membership). This new version was then used on the cover of
the groundbreaking LP, The Satanic Mass (©1968), produced by the
Church of Satan. In addition to a recorded Satanic Mass, this LP included
the “Prologue” and “Books of Satan: Verses I through V”
from the then-unreleased book, The Satanic Bible. The album’s
cover design was credited to “Hugo Zorilla,” a pseudonym used by
Anton LaVey for some of his artwork. The liner notes, attributed to Franklin
Kincaid, say that “the Satanic symbol, Baphomet,” was adopted from
the Knights Templar. This symbol was finally widely-released to the general
public in December of 1969 with the publication of The Satanic Bible,
where it adorned the cover and appeared on the interior page introducing the
section detailing the Satanic Ritual. And, significantly, here in this book
was the very first time that this sigil was referred to as the “symbol
of Baphomet” in any publication available to a mass audience. It was
this version which the Church of Satan then had made into cloisonné
medallions (which were only available to members) and it became the standard
logo for all Church of Satan materials. We began calling it more precisely
the “Sigil of Baphomet” and so it was named in print in The Satanic
(released in December of 1972). It should be noted that this version
is a copyrighted graphic which belongs to the Church of Satan alone. We have
the legal right to place the © symbol next to this rendering, should
we care to do so.

The Satanic Bible coverThe
Church of Satan did file for (1981) and then received (1983) a trademark
which protects the use of the Sigil of Baphomet with the words “Church
of Satan.”
The Church of Satan therefore has the legal right to place the ® symbol
meaning “registered trademark” next to this combination of symbol
and words. This trademark also prohibits anyone from using something similar
in combination of name and symbol, which could constitute an illegal dilution
or blurring of the trademark.

Current trademark
laws are now in flux regarding this issue of trademark blurring—the use
of marks similar to existing trademarks—but they are moving in the direction
of favoring the forbidding of marks that could be considered misleading in
any way, shape, or form.

The Satanic Mass album coverAnton
LaVey authorized Hell’s Kitchen Productions, Inc. to produce a Sigil
of Baphomet medallion, and so a minor variation of the Church’s official
Sigil of Baphomet was created in which the Hebrew characters between the circles
were no longer outlines, but filled-in (a minor change). This authorized variation
is also used exclusively on the official website and can be seen at the top
of this page and throughout this site. This rendering is also protected by
copyright laws.

The copyright
for the artwork that appears on the cover of the Bessy book belonged to
the publisher of that book. Since that book is out of print, the copyright
has lapsed, and thus the rights for the text reverted to the author, and
the rights for the graphics contained therein would need to be determined—usually
they revert to the artist or other source of origin. After passage of
enough time, if the estates of the authors/creators do not renew the copyrights,
the items in question then enter public domain. Thus, the Bessy cover
rendition is most probably now in the public

Church of Satan Main AltarIf
anyone wants to legally use our version of the “Sigil of Baphomet,” they
may ask for permission, and we have generally been quite liberal in licensing
people to use this for various projects and goods—though we usually
only allow its use on websites when (and where) they are mentioning the
Church of Satan. Otherwise, those wishing to use a public domain version
of a goat / pentagram / “Leviathan” symbol must go back to
the historically published sources, or they may take the challenge
to draw a fresh one.

It is interesting
to note that, prior to its slight enhancement and adoption by the Church
of Satan, this sinister symbol appears never to have been used by any who
would actually honor and revere it. Rather it was conceived, nutured
and even continually passed along by Levi, de Guaita, Wirth and others—men
who professed to oppose that which they imagined it to represent. These
were ceremonial magicians, condemned by the Christian church yet still
largely captive to the common mass morality of their day. In their quest
to counter their critics, they dreamed up an imaginary cabal of selfish,
unconstrained, unconventional black magicians in comparison to whom they
hoped to seem quite acceptable to polite society. Was this a simple
fiction to deflect public persecution or a more fully formed thoughtform
fueled and fed by the nightmares and perhaps even secret, supressed desires
in the unconscious minds of these magicians? There is no way to know
for certain. The history is clear, however, that the image of the inverse
pentagram invoking the head of the sabbatic goat was conjured up from their
imaginations, imbued with geat resonance by the forbidden things it was
believed to represent, and then passed from one seeker to the next for
more than a century until Anton LaVey embraced it, and made what it had
always symbolized manifestly real.

So marking
the original appearance of this potent concept to Lévi’s
description of 1855 C.E., we Satanists now celebrate the 150th anniversary
of the coming forth of what we call the Sigil of Baphomet. We know that
it shall continue its dark reign in minds and hearts for years to come
as the preeminent visual distillation of the iconoclastic philosophy of

to include additional information on 30 April, XL A.S.

special thanks to Reverend Robert The Merciless for his excellent scholarship
and substantial contributions to the revision.

A fine site that has public domain versions of the Sigil of Baphomet, ready for downloading is

Walpurgis 9’s Hellish Graphics. Just click on the Sigil below to visit.

Baphomet Variant

Click on
the links to visit our Original Gallery and
our S.I.G. Gallery of new renditions of the Sigil of Baphomet.

The Nature of Satanism


To many self-styled “Satanists”, “Satanism” is nothing more than an inversion of Christianity, a tantrum against a Christian background which is often never disposed of. If they truly reject Christianity, then why the preoccupation with its symbols? Why the constant harping on about Jesus and “god” in a self-conscious effort to “blaspheme”? How can you “blaspheme” something you are not even supposed to be a part of? How can you “blaspheme” the Christians’ god unless you accept his reality? How can you “blaspheme” Jesus unless you really believe him to be the “son of god”, as the Christians maintain? The excessive attempts to “blaspheme” – indeed the preoccupation to be “blasphemous” – indicate a mentality that is still fundamentally Christian. Sure, Christianity is still an enemy, one of several. Any dogma which seeks to impose itself against the freedom of the individual to be as he is, is an enemy. Christianity is the product of a certain type of person. People make religions; religions do not make people. The Christian type is born.

Satanists are outside of Christianity. Yet so many claiming to be “Satanists” exist solely within the Christian context. They take their cue from Christian theology and Christian imagery, and merely reverse it, to be “blasphemous” in an effort to infuriate that jealous old Hebrew god Jehovah, which they obviously believe in, and think they are so “evil” for doing so. The types of person attracted to Christianity and other such repressive dogmas that stifle the life-force are themselves born devoid of that life-force; i.e. genetically, biologically. They are in rebellion against nature and the cosmos. They are, in esoteric terms, shut off from the Tree of Life, empty shells – klippoths. Christianity is a death cult – an inversion of nature. Satanism is not inverse Christianity; Christianity is inverse nature. Satanism is a reflection of nature and the cosmos. Our self-styled “Satanists” so obsessed with “blasphemy” are accepting the Church’s own definition of “Satanism”.


From whence Satan-ism then? From Sat and Tan, Sanskrit for the Dark Force infusing the cosmos (Sat), and (Tan). The Hebrews recognised this life-force as the enemy, and so “Satan” became their “adversary” because they (the Jehovah cult) were shut off from the Tree of life (he flow of life). We see the Satanic cosmology in Tantra and Taoism among other ways, reflecting the flow of the life-force in humanity; concepts far more ancient than Christianity or Judaism.


The symbol of this life-force is the pentagram with two points up. This is not an “inverse” pentagram; it is the right way up, the Eastern star in its correct position: a symbol of life, of health, of the Sat and the Tan. Notice the centre forms the shape (pentagon) of a house with the five (Tan) points representing how the Sat manifests in nature. The one-point-up pentagram, so beloved by self-righteous New Age types, is the house reversed; nature on its head. This Dark Force in nature creates and destroys, causes change in the cosmos; what scientists today call “Entropy”. Satan is the god/dess of life, the cosmocrator; Pan – the All. Come out of the cemetery, forget the death imagery and the morbidity; rejoice in life, and have a happy day.


The following was a dialogue with a French inquirer who sought information on Satanism. His thinking on what Satanism was had been scrambled by the propaganda of the Christling priests. “…Satanism attracts me. I am very serious and determined! I do not consider Satanism to be ‘fun’! I hate ‘fun’! … I want to live the Satanic way. Can you help me?”


I would like to make a few comments on some of your remarks, which I hope you will not think patronizing. First, “Satanism isn’t fun!” Surely the JOY of life is the very essence of Satanism. What happened to the Devil as the cosmic Trickster – virtually a Universal Archetype (Coyote to the American Indians, Loki to the Norse, for e.g.)? The Devil as the Joker in the pack, the Mocker, that gives unpredictability and chance to life?

What about Satan as Dionysus or as Pan, as the frolicking, wild, chasing, playing god of the pagans? That figure of merriment that the Christling Church hated so much that he became the very face of Satan himself, as the horned and goat-footed god of the witches? It is the Christling church which has defined Satan and Satanism as sombre and the Satanist’s favourite hangout as the graveyard. Some sorry and misguided types actually fall for that and become the very definition of a “Satanist” which the Christling priests invented. And of course some are indeed sombre and joyless, so lacking in Life that their TRUE place is in the Christling Church.

What were the witches’ Sabbaths of Medieval times other than a cathartic release from the morbidity and stifling Puritanism of the Church? An excuse for one big communal party, where such horrendous things as dancing could be indulged in, which one could commit other “sins” such as gluttony. Where the peasant folk could for once escape the watchful eyes of the joyless prelates of the Nazarene, and have some FUN!?

And these Sabbaths – these big parties – were then typically twisted by the priests to be described as gatherings where the folk would be forced to kiss the arse of The Devil, to eat rotten food and drink urine.


Even that arch-propagator of misinformation, Dennis Wheatley, at least had it right regarding the Sabbaths:
“People all brought their contributions [of food and drink. The man who represented the goat or stag god… would, we may assume, have been a cheerful popular fellow and probably the village joker. Those who played instruments would form a band… Everyone else danced, feasted, drank and fornicated… Come cockcrow, and the revellers, tired but happy wended their way back to their poor hovels, to face another week of gruelling work; but with the cheering thought that its end they would dance, feast and enjoy free love again.”
(Wheatley, The Devil & All His Works)

Transcribed by Graeme Wilson (OSV – Dunedin)


I view the essence of Satanism as the struggle of the individual will to overcome the limitations of the cosmos. This struggle includes active opposition. The cosmic order seeks to limit and control the will and desire of the individual, and so only an active and direct opposition to the cosmos will allow the individual to transcend these limits. Through this struggle, the individual is strengthened, and the individual is freed from the limiting illusions imposed by the enforcer of the cosmic order, the deity or demiurge. Satan, or Lucifer, is the embodiment of rebellion against deity and the cosmic order.

I consider my definition of Satanism to be more or less in accord with what is known as the left-hand path. In his work “Lords of the Left-Hand Path”, S.E. Flowers identified two separate branches of the left-hand path: The Materialistic, and the Transcendent. The materialistic concerns itself with tangible goals in the natural universe such as wealth, power, and sexual pleasure. The transcendent branch, on the other hand, seeks to cultivate and develop non-natural consciousness through the attainment of gnosis(i.e. cultivation of the black flame). My approach is much closer to the transcendent branch of the Left-Hand path.

I identify Satan (or Lucifer) as the embodiment of rebellion against deity and cosmic order. The relationship between Satan and the cosmic deity or demiurge is analogous to that of 11, reaching beyond the limits of 10. While 10 represents order, stasis, and law, 11 represents chaos, dynamism and rebellion. Eleven is not only the number of Satan, in my view, but that of the qliphothic forces and of the black flame itself. I will go on to define these terms in greater depth later on in this pody. By identifying with Lucifer and participating in the anti-cosmic rebellion, the Satanist transforms himself into something which exists outside of the cosmic order-Liberated, inspired, and strong.

Black magic is the practical counterpart of the ideology of Satanism. It is the process of the individual imposing its will on that of the cosmos by unnatural means(in other words, by methods not contained within the usual limits of cosmic order). This is contrasted with white magic, where the magician attempts to harmonize his will with that of the cosmos.. The individual will and cosmic order are often in opposition. As a result, chaotic and destructive energies are often unleashed by the black magician in the course of his work. For the Satanic black magician, this is not only acceptable, but a part of the struggle against the cosmos.

In my magical work, I see the cosmos as a dialectic struggle between two opposed and complementary forces: Fire and ice, light and darkness, chaos and order, subject and object. Initially, however, there existed a state of pure chaos-An uncreated void, a state of undefined potential and freedom. This is embodied in the Norse cosmos as “Ginnungagap” , or the magically-charged void. This state of all-potential expressed itself in a pair of opposites: The Will to Manifest, and the Will to Return to Mystery. The former is embodied by the demiurge and cosmic order, the latter by chaos and the destructive energies of the qliphoth. I see the qliphoth as a sort of anti- matter which seeks to devour the created cosmos and return it to a state of non-manifestation.

Like anti-matter, the qliphothic forces are powerful, dangerous, and utterly alien to the cosmic order. As such, they make a potent tool for the satanic black magician in his anti-cosmic struggle. Another aspect of black magic is the development of the shadow-self. The shadow-self is the black flame which exists in the magician, the gift of Lucifer/Prometheus. The shadow-self is the unnatural essence of the black magician-The dynamic force which challenges him to evolve, to do battle, to seek the unknown vigorously. It is perhaps best understood as a type of Desire. In psychology, the Jungian shadow was linked with the id, the subconscious, and brooding unmanifest desire. While on one hand this shadow challenges and opposes the conscious will, it also is a source of vast potential and growth. It is a microcosm of the uncreated void present within the magician. It is the desire of the individual to transcend limitations, to seek gnosis, and to search relentlessly for wisdom and spiritual/magical power-The essence of Lucifer-Satan.



Spear of Destiny

Ravenscroft is intriguing because instead of reporting historical influences on Hitler, he presents secret history in a narrative form that purports to be factual and that-if true maybe even if only poetically “true”-goes a long way toward finding a convincing occult explanation for the Nazi phenomenon.

Two challenges to Ravenscroft’s facts, discussed below, have led some readers to conclude his book is more nearly a novel than strict history. Nonetheless, its provocative premise and fluent synthesis of black magical thematics will keep it on occult booklists until a better effort at explaining Hitler comes along.

Ravenscroft, a British journalist, historian, and World War II commando officer, spent four years in Nazi prison camps after he was captured attempting to assassinate General Erwin Rommel in North Africa in 1941. His personal perspective on the Hitler era is based on material he says he got in a state of transcendent consciousness while imprisoned. He introduces his methodology by speaking of: my own experience of higher levels of consciousness whilst in a Nazi Concentration Camp during the war, and how the nature of this transcendent experience had guided me to a study of the Spear of Longinus and the legend of world destiny which had grown up around it.

Later, in London, his intuitive suspicions about certain grail relics and their importance in occult Hitlerian history were confirmed by a Viennese exile called Dr. Walter Johannes Stein who died in 1957.

Dr. Stein spent much of the war as a British secret agent, but before that time he was a scholar who employed white magical means to clairvoyantly investigate historical events. It was his book on the grail mythos published in Stuttgart in 1928 and titled The Ninth Century: World History in the Light of the Holy Grailthat attracted Ravenscroft to him.

The Spear of Destinyfocuses first on Hitler’s lost years in Vienna from 1909 to 1913. During that time, Ravenscroft writes, Dr. Stein was pursuing his occult researches as a student at the University of Vienna and getting to know Hitler, then a dropout living in a flophouse.

Vienna was during Hitler’s years there a vortex of modern thinking. Freud was in practice at Berggasse; Ludwig Wittgenstein was in residence pondering avant garde philosophy and metaphysics; Gustav Mahler had returned home to die and to name his protege, Arnold Schonberg. In contrast there persisted the deep anti-Semitic currents that had caused Mahler to convert to Catholicism, that forced Freud eventually to flee to London and that informed the ancient pan-German folkoric nostalgia espoused by Guido von List.

This old black magician, whose occult lodge Ravenscroft says substituted the swastika for the cross in perversion and the practice of medieval thaumaturgy, looked like a wizard in floppy cap and long white beard. His link to Hitler was allegedly through an occult bookseller, Ernst Pretzche, in whose shop the future Fuhrer found a second home.

In the shop Dr. Stein found a copy of Wolfram von Eschenbach’s Parzival, the medieval grail romance that Dr. Stein was himself researching for his work on the ninth century. In the book’s margins were handwritten annotations; looking them over Dr.Stein was fascinated and repelled:

This was no ordinary commentary but the work of somebody who had achieved more than a working knowledge of the black arts! The unknown commentator had found the key to unveiling many of the deepest secrets of the Grail, yet obviously spurned the Christian ideals of the Knights and delighted in the devious machinations of the Anti-Christ. It suddenly dawned on him that he was reading the footnotes of Satan!

The footnotes, of course, proved to have been Hitler’s. Soon afterward, Dr.Stein and Hitler saw the Reich’s lance together in the Imperial Museum at the Hofburg. Dr. Stein had been there before and had never failed to be moved by the sight of the old relic, supposed to have been moved by the original spear with which the Roman centurion, Longinus, pierced the side of Christ during the crucifixation. Longinus was a German, and his “spear of destiny” was fated to play a magical role in the careers of German leaders like Charlemagne, Otto the Great, and Frederick Barbarossa. Dr. Stein said the spear inspired in him the emotion expressed in the motto of the knights of the holy grail: Durch Mitleid wissen, “through compassion to self knowledge.”

Then he glanced at Hitler:

Walter Stein found he was not the only one moved by the sight of this historic spearhead. Adolf Hitler stood beside him, like a man in a trance, a man over whom some dreadful magic spell had been cast… The very space around him seemed enlivened with some subtle irradiation, a kind of ghostly ectoplasmic light. His whole physiognomy and stance appeared transformed as if some might Spirit now inhabited his very soul, creating within and around him a kind of evil transfiguration of its own nature and power.

Latter Hitler took Dr. Stein up the Danube to visit his mystic teacher, a rustic woodcutter and herbalist named Hans Lodz “who retained in his peasant’s blood the last traces of the atavistic clairvoyance of the ancient Germanic tribes” and who “resembled a mischievous yet malevolent dwarf from the pages of Grimm’s Fairy Tales or an illustration from a book on ancient Germanic folklore”.16 The men took a swim in the river at which Dr. Stein noticed that Hitler had only one testicle.

It was Lodz, Dr.Stein learned, who had prepared for Hitler a peyote concoction that afforded him psychedelic insight into his past lives. The peyote itself had come from Pretzche, who had lived for a time in the German colony in Mexico. Hitler had hoped that his former existences, viewed in his drug trance, would include an early incarnation as a powerful Teutonic ruler, but it was not to be.

Instead his psychedelic perception revealed non Eschenbach’s Parzival to have been prophetic of events that would take place a thousand years after it was written, i.e. in the present. And it showed Hitler to have been the historical personage behind the evil sorcerer Klingsor, the very spirit of the anti-Christ and the villain of Parzival.

According to Dr. Stein’s work Klingsor was in fact Landulf II of Capua, the traitorous confidant of the Holy Roman Emperor who betrayed Christianity to the Moslem invaders of Italy and Spain.

Armed with the knowledge of his black spiritual ancestry, Ravenscroft writes, Hitler moved to Germany, joined the Bavarian Army, survived the hellish trench warfare on the western front, won the Iron Cross, second class, and got discharged in Munich where he encountered the men who were to invent National Socialism.

Virtually every study of Hitler’s time in Munich mentions the Thule Society as superficially a kind of Elk’s Club of German mythology which met often and openly at a fancy metropolitan hotel and for a time counted Hitler as a member. Behind the scenes, however the society seems to have been considerably more sinister.

Robert Payne whose excellent Hitler biography contains no occult explanations, describes the Thule Society as the center of the right wing opposition to the brief Bavarian postwar socialist coup under the Jewish intellectual Kurt Eisner.

The reaction set in swiftly, as the extreme right gathered its forces. The headquarters of the reaction was the Hotel Vierjahreszeiten, where several floors were given over to the Thule Society, ostensibly a literary club devoted to the study of Nordic culture but in fact a secret political organization devoted to violent anti-Semitism and rule by an aristocratic elite. The name of the organization derived from ultima Thule, the unknown northern land believed to be the original home of the German race.

The symbol of the Thule Society was a swastika with a dagger enclosed in laurel leaves.

Most of the occult historians of the era believe the Thule Society operated on a deeper level still, a level headed by a mysterious figure called Dietrich Eckart. Goodrick-Clarke calls Eckart Hitler’s mentor in the early days of the Nazi Party, along with Rudolf Hess and Alfred Rosenberg.18

According to Ravenscroft, Eckart, like Hitler, first achieved transcendence through psychedelic drugs. Research on peyote by the German pharmacologist Ludwig Lewin had been published in 1886, leading to widespread popular experimentation. Later a heroin addict, in earlier days Eckart used peyote in the practice on neo- pagan magic in Berlin. He came to believe that he, too was the reincarnation of ninth century character. In his case it was Bernard of Barcelona, a notorious betrayer of Christianity to the Arabs and a black magician who used thaumaturgy to hold off Carolingian armies in Spain.

Eckart assertedly organized Kurt EIsner’s assassination and personally chose Hitler-by then a battle-scarred veteran of the horrors of trench warfare and a fervent critic of the armistice-to lead the Aryan race back to supremacy.

Ravenscroft writes that Hitler had been prepared for satanic initiation by his experiences in Vienna with peyote and with the spear and by his mustard gassing in 1918, which left him blind and in a state of enforced trance for several days.

He also says that the techniques Dietrich Eckart used were in part derived from the sexual magic of Aleister Crowley. In 1912 this famed British magician was named IX British head of a secret Berlin lodge called Ordo Templi Orientis which practiced various forms of sexual magic.19

Ravenscroft writes “there can be little doubt” that both Crowley and Eckart conducted deep studies of the Arabian astrological magic performed by Klingsor’s real life counterpart, Landulf II. It was to Sicily-then a Moslem stronghold-that Landulf fled after his traitorous links to Islam were disclosed. And it was in a dark tower in the mountains of the southwest corner of that island that his evil soul festered with additional bitterness over his castration by the relatives of a noblewoman he had raped. There he practiced sadistic satanism of a nature that foreshadowed the horrors of Nazi concentration camps.

If the legends that have come down from these dark centuries of European history are true, these rituals carried out at Kalot Enbolot included terrible tortures such as the slitting open of the stomach of sacrificial victims and the slow drawing open of the stomach of sacrificial victims and the slow drawing of their entrails, the driving of stakes through the orifices of their bodies before disembowelling them, and the invoking of Spirits of Darkness (incubis) to rape young virgins kidnapped from their families.

It was from his studies of the power available to practitioners of such perversities that Eckart devised the rituals he used when he “opened the centers of Adolf Hitler to give him a vision of and a means of communication with the Powers.” Ravenscroft concludes, though he declines to furnish the full details: “Suffice it to say that they were indescribably sadistic and ghastly.”

Having done his worst, Eckart soon died, proudly advising those around him:

Follow Hitler! he will dance, but it is I who have called the tune!

I have initiated him into theSecret Doctrine, opened his centers of vision and given him the means to communicate with the Powers. Do not mourn for me: I shall have influenced history more than any other German.

Not unnaturally the question rises whether any of The Spear of Destinyis true. It’s certainly a great story, one which Ravenscroft elaborates with a lengthy investigation of Hitler’s sex life, in which he makes a case for associating the reports of the Fuehrer’s missing testis to the perversities resulting from Landulf’s castration.

The problem lies with Ravenscroft’s primary source, Dr. Walter Johannes Stein. And the problem with Dr.Stein is really two problems: one his method of historical research: and two, the fact that he is dead and unable to speak for himself.

Given his method, of course, this second problem should not be insurmountable. Had we the technique, Dr. Stein could presumably verify each of Ravenscroft’s assertion for us from beyond the grave. For Dr. Stein is alleged to have studied history not in the libraries and archives that are the usual haunt of the historian but in an arena called the Cosmic Chronicle where, according to Ravenscroft, past present and future were united in a higher dimension of time.

What’s more Ravenscroft reveals in his introduction, Dr.Stein taught the same techniques to him.

It is, however, undeniably difficult, if not unprecedented, to footnote clairvoyance. We have to take on faith that the The Spear of Destiny is what Dr.Stein told Ravenscroft. This is not to say that all of his information came from the Cosmic Chronicle; Dr. Stein as we have seen is purported to have been present in Vienna during Hitler’s lost years there. Nor did their close association end in Austria. Ravenscroft says Dr. Stein “watched at close quarters” the founding of the Nazi party and Hitler’s association with Eckart and other sinister mentors.

When Reichsfuehrer SS Heinrich Himmler ordered Dr.Stein’s arrest in Stuttgart in 1933 in order to press him into service with the SS Occult Bureau, he escaped from Germany and brought with him to Britain the most authoritative knowledge of the occultism of the Nazi Party.

Nowhere does Ravenscroft made it clear whether he’s talking about eyewitness knowledge on Dr.Stein’s part or about the sort of information to be gleaned from the Cosmic Chronicle. But two critics of the The Spear of Destinydo cast doubt on several of the factual assertions upon the factual assertions upon which Ravenscroft’s argument is built.

One is Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, whose book on the occult roots of Nazism is quoted above. In an appendix called The Modern Mythology of Nazi Occultism, Goodrick-Clarke takes Ravenscroft to task for the story about Hitler’s relations with the occult bookseller in Vienna and for his claim that Guido Von List was forced to flee from outraged Viennese Catholics in 1909 after the sexual rites of his blood brotherhood were exposed. he writes flatly,

There is not a shred of evidence for such rituals. List was never obliged to leave Vienna and he enjoyed the patronage of prominent Vienna figures…The fictional nature of the whole episode surrounding the annotated copy of copy of Parzival is suggested by the similarity of Pretzsche’s obscure bookshop to the one described by Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton in Zanoni, (1842), which probably served Ravenscroft as a literary model.

Goodrick-Clarke also criticizes Jean Michael Angebert’s book, The Occult and the Third Reich, cited above. He brands as imaginary Angebert’s account of the young Hitler’s association with Lanz von Lebenfels.

As noted earlier, Goodrick-Clarke’s book is an important and serious piece of research on Guido von List and Lanz von Lievenfels. But the author seems a little over-sensitive toward other writers who invoke his two subjects. Nevertheless, his critique of Angebert and Ravenscroft, though brief, does offer a glimpse of the misgivings that professional historians feel regarding such material.

More extensive criticisms have been offered by Christoph Lindenberg in his review of THE The Spear of Destiny in the German journal Die Drie. Lindenberg has done some effective digging at the Vienna Records office. Ravenscroft has Hitler sitting high up in the cheap seats of the Vienna Opera House in the winter of 1910 – 1 watching Wagner’s Parzifal and sympathizing with Klingsor. This proves to have been impossible, because Lindenberg learned that the first performance of Wagner’s opera took place three years later, on January 14,1914.

Ravenscroft’s second mistake was to name the Viennese bookseller who introduced Hitler to drugs. “No better name occurred to him than Pretsche, popular among English writers of fiction for German malefactors,” Lindenberg writes scornfully before revealing that extensive checks of Vienna city and business directories and police records for the years 1892 through 1920 were negative for the name in question.

Next, Lindenberg takes issue with Ravenscroft’s description of the Danube trip Hitler and Dr. Stein took in May 1913, to visit the mystic woodcutter, Hands Lodz:

We can overlook Ravenscroft’s mistake of speaking of “Wachau” as a place and not of the region which really it is. But the details do not fit: the snow melting in May, the steamer running in spite of the floods, bathing in the river- it makes no sense. Certainly wrong is the statement that Hitler had only one testicle… all this has been completely refuted by Werner Maser.

Ravenscroft’s account of Hitler’s circumstances in Vienna also come in for some heavy criticism. Dr. Stein reportedly sat in a window seat in Demel’s Cafe, reading the anonymous marginalia in the copy of Parzival he’d found and concluding they were “the footnotes of Satan” when he looked through the glass and beheld “the most arrogant face and demonical eyes he had ever seen”. This was of course the future Fuehrer in his legendary guise as an impoverished pavement artist, selling homemade postcards, dressed in a big black “sleazy” coat, his toes visible through the cracks in his shoes. When in August, 1912, he sought Hitler out at the “flophouse” he lived in , in Meldemannstrasse, he was told Hitler was away at Spittal-an-der-Drau collecting a legacy left him by an aunt. Thereafter, Hitler dressed well.

Hitler did receive a legacy from his aunt, Johanna Poelzl, Lindenberg reports. But this happens in March, 1911, and the aunt lived in Spital-with-one-t, not on the Drau but in southern Austria. Furthermore,

At no time of life did Hitler live in impoverished conditions, rather he had always sufficient money. In the Meldenmannstrasse, a kind of large hotel, Hitler paid a rent of 15 Kronen a month. So he could afford a fairly expensive room and had no need to sell his pictures, which in any case were no postcards. So this scene too, that impoverished Hitler dressed in an oversized black coat selling water colors in front of the Cafe Dehmel does not agree with the facts either (cf. the two works by Werner Maser who with incredible care collected all ascertained facts of Hitler’s youth).

In his discussion of the holy lance’s power to evoke transcendent experience, Ravenscroft has a scene in which the chief of the German general staff, Helmut von Moltke, visited the relic in the company of Conrad von Hoetzendorf, an Austrian general, shortly before the outbreak of World War I. The spear’s presence led von Moltke to have a trance vision of himself incarnated as Pope Nicolas I, a ninth century pontiff concerned, like von Moltke, with the balance of geopolitical power between east and west.

Untrue protests Lindenberg. “For Moltke visited Vienna neither in 1913 nor in 1914. Conrad and Moltke met on May 12, 1914 at Karlsbad, from September 7 – 10, 1913, in Silesia, and at Leipzig on October 18 at the Centenary of the Battle of Leipzig. They had no other meeting.”

Lindenberg has several other criticisms to make, such as the assertion that “A number of people who intimately knew Walter Johannes Stein in the last years of his life state that Stein never met Hitler.” Unfortunately Ravenscroft’s aversion to footnotes has also afflicted his critic, and Lindenberg nowhere names these people nor does he document his other assertions.

Lindenberg doesn’t like Ravenscroft’s book; he calls it ” a pollution of our spiritual environment.” And it is manifestly difficult for him or anyone to rebut research done on the cosmic level.

What, in the end, was Hitler all about? Perhaps no better explanation can be found than W.H. Auden’s suggestions, made in his poem “September 1,1939” and printed as an epigram to Robert G.L. Waite’s book. The date is the beginning of Hitler’s Blitzkrieg against Poland:

Accurate scholarship can Unearth the whole offence From Luther until now That has driven a culture mad, Find what occurred at Linz, What huge imago made A psychopathic god: I and the public know What all schoolchildren learn, Those to whom evil is done Do evil in return.



Adolph Hitler and the Occult

The Unknown Hitler: Nazi Roots in the Occult

On April 6, 1919, in Bavaria, left wing socialists and anarchists proclaimed the Bavarian Soviet Republic. The brains of the revolution were a group of writers who had little idea of administration. Life in munich grew chaotic. The counter-revolutionary forces, the whites, composed of various groups of decommissioned soldiers known as “Frei Corps”, equipped and financed by the mysterious Thule Society, defeated the Bavarian Soviet within a matter of weeks.

Many other decommissioned soldiers waited out the turbulence in barracks, pfc Adolph Hitler among them. After the Bavarian Republic had been defeated by the Whites, in May, Hitler’s superiors put him to work in the post revolution investigating commission. His indictments injected ruthless efficiency into the kangaroo courts as he fingered hundreds of noncommissioned officers and enlisted men who had sympathized with the communist and anarchists. He was subsequently sent to attend special anticommunist training courses and seminars at the University which were financed by the Reichswehr administration and by private donors from the Thule Society. This led to an assignment in the intelligence division of the postwar German army, to infiltrate groups that could organize the working classes while the communists were weak. On a September evening, 1919, Hitler turned up in the Sternecker Beer Hall where members and friends of the budding German Workers Party had gathered.

He quietly listened to the presentation by engineer Gottfried Feder, a Thule Society member, who talked about jewish control over lending capital. When one of the other group members called for Bavaria to break away from the rest of Germany, Hitler sprang into action. The astonished audience stood by while his highly aggressive remarks and compelling oratory swept through the room. After Hitler had finished his harangue, party chairman and founder, Anton Drexler, immediately asked him to a meeting of the party’s steering committee held a few days later. He was asked to join the committee as its seventh member, responsible for advertising and propaganda.

Back in 1912, several German occultists with radical anti-semitic inclinations decided to form a “magic” lodge, which they named the Order of Teutons. the main founders were Theodor Fritsch, a publisher of an anti-semitic journal; Philipp Stauff, pupil of the racist Guido Von List, and Hermann Pohl, the order’s chancellor. (Pohl would drop out three years later to found his own bizarre lodge, the ‘Walvater Teutonic Order of the Holy Grail’.)

The Order of Teutons was organized along the lines of the Free Masons or the Rosicrucians, having differing degrees of initiation, only persons who could fully document that they were of pure “aryan” ancestry were allowed to join.

In 1915, Pohl was joined by Rudolf Blauer, who held a Turkish passport and practiced sufi meditation. He also dabbled in astrology and was an admirer of Lanz Von Liebenfels and Guido Von List, both pathologically anti-semitic. Blauer went by the name of Rudolf Freiherr Von Seboottendorf. He was very wealthy, although the origin of his fortune is unknown. He became the Grand Master of the Bavarian Order and he founded the Thule Society, with Pohl’s approval, in 1918.

After the Bavarian communist revolution of 1918, the Thule Society became a center of thea counterrevolutionary subculture. An espionage network and arms caches were organized. The Thule Club rooms became a nest of resistance to the revolution and the Munich Soviet Republic.

Journalist Karl Harrer was given the job of founding a political “worker circle”. He realized that the workers would reject any program that was presented to them by a member of the conservative “privileged” class. Harrer knew that the mechanic Anton Drexler, who was working for the railroads, was a well-known anti-semite, chauvinist and proletarian. With drexler as nominal chairman, Harrer founded the German Workers Party in January 1919

The German Workers Party was only one of many associations founded and controlled by the Thule Society. The Thule was the “mother” to the German Socialist Party, led by Julius Streicher, and the right-wing radical Oberland Free Corps. It published the Munich observer, which later became the National Observer. Hitler became the most prominent personality in the party. He caused Harrer to drop out, and he pushed Drexler, the nominal chairman, to the sidelines. He filled key positions with his own friends from the Thule Society and the Army. During the summer of 1920, upon his suggestion, the party was renamed the National Socialist German Worker Party (NASDAP). The new name was intended to equally attract nationalists and proletarians.

To go along with the new name his mass movement also required a flag with a powerful symbol. Among many designs under consideration, Hitler picked the one suggested by Thule member Dr. Krohn: a red cloth with a white circle in the middle containing a black swastika.

Hitler wanted to turn the German Workers Party into a mass-conscious fighting party, but Harrer and Drexler were hesitant, due in part to their woeful financial situation. The Thule Society was not yet supplying very much money and no one seemed to know how to build up a mass party. Hitler arranged two public meetings in obscure beer halls, and he drafted leaflets and posters, but there was no real breakthrough.

All of this changed dramatically at the end of the 1919 when Hitler met Dietrich Eckart. Most biographers have underestimated the influence that Eckart exerted on Hitler. He was the wealthy publisher and editor-in-chief of an anti-semitic journal which he called In Plain German. Eckart was also a committed occultist and a master of magic. As an initiate, Eckart belonged to the inner circle of the Thule Society as well as other esoteric orders.

Briefly, the creed of the Thule Society inner circle is as follows: Thule was a legendary island in the far north, similar to Atlantis, supposedly the center of a lost, high-level civilization. But not all secrets of that civilization had been completely wiped out. Those that remained were being guarded by ancient, highly intelligent beings (similar to the “Masters” of Theosophy or the White Brotherhood). The truly initiated could establish contact with these beings by means of magic-mystical rituals. The “Masters” or “Ancients” allegedly would be able to endow the initiated with supernatural strength and energy. With the help of these energies the goal of the initiated was to create a race of Supermen of “Aryan” stock who would exterminate all “inferior” races.

There can be no doubt that Eckart – who had been alerted to Hitler by other Thulists – trained Hitler in techniques of self confidence, self projection, persuasive oratory, body language and discursive sophistry. With these tools, in a short period of time he was able to move the obscure workers party from the club and beer hall atmosphere to a mass movement. The emotion charged lay speaker became an expert orator, capable of mesmerizing a vast audience.

One should not underestimate occultism’s influence on Hitler. His subsequent rejection of Free Masons and esoteric movements, of Theosophy, of Anthrosophy, does not necessarily mean otherwise. Occult circles have long been known as covers for espionage and influence peddling. Hitler’s spy apparatus under Canaris and Heydrich were well aware of these conduits, particularly from the direction of Britain which had within its MI5 intelligence agency a department known as the Occult Bureau. That these potential sources of trouble were purged from Nazi life should not be taken to mean that Hitler and the Nazi secret societies were not influenced by mystical and occult writers such as Madame Blavatsky, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Guido Von List, Lanz Von Liebenfels, Rudolf Steiner, George Gurdjieff, Karl Haushofer and Theodor Fritsch. Although Hitler later denounced and ridiculed many of them, he did dedicate his book Mein Kampf to his teacher Dietrich Eckart.

A frequent visitor to Landsberg Prison where Hitler was writing Mein Kampf with the help of Rudolf Hess, was General Karl Haushofer, a university professor and director of the Munich Institute of Geopolitics. Haushofer, Hitler, and Hess had long conversations together. Hess also kept records of these conversations. Hitler’s demands for German “Living Space” in the east at the expense of the Slavic nations were based on the geopolitical theories of the learned professor. Haushofer was also inclined toward the esoteric. as military attache in Japan, he had studied Zen-Buddhism. He had also gone through initiations at the hands of Tibetan Lamas. He became Hitler’s second “esoteric mentor”, replacing Dietrich Eckart.

In Berlin, Haushofer had founded the Luminous Lodge or the Vril Society. The lodge’s objective was to explore the origins of the Aryan race and to perform exercises in concentration to awaken the forces of “Vril”. Haushofer was a student of the Russian magician and metaphysician Gregor Ivanovich Gurdyev (George Gurdjieff).

Both Gurdjeiff and Haushofer maintained that they had contacts with secret Tibetan Lodges that possessed the secret of the “Superman”. The lodge included Hitler, Alfred Rosenberg, Himmler, Goring, and Hitler’s subsequent personal physician Dr. Morell. It is also known that Aleister Crowley and Gurdjieff sought contact with Hitler.

Hitler’s unusual powers of suggestion become more understandable if one keeps in mind that he had access to the “secret” psychological techniques of the esoteric lodges. Haushofer taught him the techniques of Gurdjieff which, in turn, were based on the teachings of the Sufis and the Tibetan Lamas- and familiarized him with the Zen teaching of the Japanese Society of the Green Dragon.

From The Unknown Hitler by Wulf Schwartzwaller, Berkeley Books, 1990

The Men Behind Hitler – excerpts from the book by Bernard Schreiber
Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) was an English political economist and historian who in 1796 published a book called “An Essay on the Principle of Population” in which he said that poverty, and thereby vice and misery, are unavoidable because population growth always exceeds food production. Checks on population growth were wars, famine, and diseases.

Malthus’s ideas had great impact, only a few asked on what his claims were actually based. Yet neither Malthus nor his later disciples ever managed to put forward any scientific proof for his theory. Many scientists have disproved Malthus’ theory and the ideology resulting from it.

However, with the book, Malthus created an atmosphere which moved his adherents in 1834 to pass a new law providing for the institution of work- houses for the poor, in which the sexes were strictly separated to curb the otherwise inevitable overbreeding. This kind of philosophy urged the calling forth of drastic measures. The full title of Charles Darwin’s famous book is not so famous: The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. In it he explains the development of life-forms as a struggle for existence. The result of this struggle would be a natural selection of those species and races who were to triumph over those weaker ones who would perish.

Francis Galton (1822-1911) was an english psychologist and a half-cousin of Darwin. Galton extended Darwin’s theory into a concept of deliberate social intervention, which he said was a logical application of evolution to the human race. He called his theory “Eugenics”, the principle of which was that by encouraging better human stock to breed and discouraging the reproduction of less desirable stock, the whole race could be improved.

Modern racism really began with Arthur Count de Gabon (1816-1882) who published his Essay on the Inequality of Human Races. He wrote in of a fair-haired Aryan race that was superior to all the others whose remnants constituted a tiny racial aristocracy decaying under the overwhelming weight of inferior races. A revival of his work in Germany began ten years after his death by the Pan-Germans, an extremely nationalistic and anti-jewish group.

In 1899, Gabon’s disciple, Houston Stewart Chaimberlain (1844-1927), an Englishman, published The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century, in Germany. He upheld the German race to be the purest and damned the inferior races, the jews and negroes, as degenerate. From this point on, Eugenics, Social Darwinism and racial hygiene fused into a single concept.

In 1904 the first chairs in Eugenics were instituted at University College, London, followed by the establishment of the Galton Laboratory for National Eugenics in 1907. In 1910 the Eugenic Record Office was founded in the United States, both institutes used the research results of the Galton Laboratory of National Eugenics to propose practical applications. Eugenics was used an the “scientific” basis upon which racism was fused to politics.

Eugenicists believed that the child of a mentally-ill person and a mentally heathy person would be a mentally-ill offspring. This led to a series of escalating regimens: separation from society, restraint, separation of the sexes in defective’s colonies, and sterilizations.

In Great Britain one of the leaders of the mental hygiene movement was Miss Evelyn Fox. She had been an active member of the Eugenics Society before the foundation of the National Council for Mental Hygiene, of which she was an officer and founder. among the board members was Sir Cyril Burt, who later founded Mensa, a high i.q. group which espoused eugenic principles. The mental hygiene movement drew strongly from the eugenic movements of whatever country they were in.

Shortly after the turn of the century eugenic organizations were set up throughout the world. While the whole world was being prepared by propaganda for the sterilization of the insane, the adherents of mental hygiene and eugenics were preparing their next step, euthanasia.

In the U.S.A., Dr. Alexis Carrel, a nobel prize winner who had been on the staff of the Rockefeller Institute since its inception, published his bookMan the Unknown in 1935. In it he suggests the removal of the mentally ill and the criminal by small euthanasia institutions equipped with suitable gases.

In 1933 the Nazi party rapidly consolidated its power. In June of that year, Minister of the Interior Wilhelm Frick put in motion the passage of the “Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity”- the sterilization law. Architect of the law was Ernst Rudin, professor of psychiatry at the Munich University, director of the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute for Genealog, and of the Research Institute for Psychiatry. A separate legal system was set up consisting of “Hereditary Health Courts”, which could decree sterilization against a person’s will. By 1935 the “Nuremburg Laws” intended to insure the racial purity of the nation and was aimed specifically at the Jews.

In 1934 the Institute for Heredity, Biology and Racial Research was founded at Frankfurt University by professor Ernst Rudin’s colleague at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, Dr. Otmar Freiherr Von Verscheur. Von Verscheur’s assistant there was Dr. Joseph Mengele.

In England, Dr. Charles Killick Millard, president of the Society of Medical Officers of Health, brought up in 1931 the question of voluntary euthanasia and proposed a suitable law. Later he became fellow founder of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legislation Society. In 1935 Lord Moynihan, president of the Royal College of Surgeons, founded the Euthanasia Society .

Sterilization and euthanasia were not the ideas of the Nazis and never had been. They were ideas which were supported and promoted throughout the world by groups with an interest in the development of mental hygiene. Germany, however, was the only country in which the political climate allowed materialization of the final goal of sterilization and euthanasia.

There is not a great deal known about “T4” compared to other aspects of Nazi Germany. T4 was the Fuhrer Chancellery and the initials came from the full address which was Tiergartenstrasse 4, Berlin. “Project T4” was fully integrated into the organizational structure of the Reich and fell under section 11b. (“mercy-death”) of the Chancellery of the Fuhrer. Four cover organizations safeguarded the project T4: the Realms Work Committee in charge of collecting information on candidates for euthanasia from questionnaires sent to hospitals, the Realms Committee for Scientific Approach to Severe Illness Due to Heredity set up exclusively to apply euthanasia to children, the charitable company for the transport of the sick which transported patients to the killing centers, and the Charitable Foundation for Institutional Care, in charge of final disposition of the victims’ remains.

At the time the questionnaires went out a number of mental hospitals were being converted for use as killing centers and schools for murder. Death chambers were built disguised as shower-baths and crematoriums, which were identical to those later to be established in the death camps in Poland.

Schooling of the personnel at Hadamar Mental Institution produced perfect murderers who were used to the smell of burnt flesh, had been taught to trick people being led to their death and to steel themselves against the crying and pleading of the victims. On arrival, the victims were stripped, dressed in paper shirts and forthwith taken to a gas chamber where they were murdered with hydrocyanic acid gas, and the bodies moved to crematoriums by conveyer belts, six bodies to a furnace. The psychiatrist in charge at Hadamar was Dr. Adolf Wahlmann, an active member of the German Mental Hygiene Movement.

After the state had been relieved of the burden of these undesireables, the operation, still under the direction of eminent mental health psychiatrists in T4, was expanded under the code of 14F13. From being limited to mental hospitals and institutions, it now embraced German and Austrian inmates and Jews in concentration camps who were sick or invalid. At Dachau at the end of 1941 a commission composed of 4 psychiatrists under professor Dr. Werner Heyde, SS Standartenfuhrer and lecturer in neurology and psychiatry at Wurzburg University, arrived at the camp and selected hundred of patients incapable of work who were transported to the gas chambers and disposed of.

The extermination camps had followed a separate evolution from the concentration camps that were opened a few months after the Nazi rise to power. These death camps had their headquarters, not in Himmler’s SS organization, but in the Fuhrer’s Chancellory (T4). Franz Stangl (Austrian Gestapo) said at the Nuremberg trials that his progression to builder and commander of the Sobibor Extermination Camp went through the Hartheim and Bernberg euthanasia centers. The original staff at Sobibor was taken from Hartheim.

During the war eugenics became associated with the Nazis and afterwards a global whitewashing began. The first step was the reconstitution of the many National Councils of Mental Hygiene. The first was the British Association for Mental Health. Lady Prescilla Norman, wife of Montagu Norman, governor of the Bank of England, had been working in the mental hygiene movement since the 20’s. In 1944 they sponsored a congress held at the Ministry of Health in London where they established the World Federation of Mental Health-WFMH.

The first elected president of the WFMH was Dr. John Rawlings Rees, a British psychiatrist associated with the Tavistock Institute. In 1948 the WFMH was formally inaugurated at the Third International Congress of Mental Health. A vice-president of the Congress was Dr. Carl G. Jung who was described by fellow vice-president Dr. Conti as “representing German psychiatry under the Nazis”. Dr. Jung had been co-editor of the Journal for Psychotherapy with Dr. M. H. Goering, the cousin of Marshal Hermann Goering.

It may be that the real key to the Third Reich lies buried in the history of Tibet, for it was here that Karl Haushofer, the initiate who taught the youthful Hitler, first met in literal fact the Superman of Nazi legend.

Origins of the swastika

By 1945 the Thousand Year Reich had become a smoking ruin. Russian soldiers pressed through the rubble, fighting from house to house, from street to street in order to link up with their British and American allies who also pressed in inexorably on the heart of the dying capital. Before they overran the eastern sector of Berlin, these Russian troops came across something very strange: vast numbers of Tibetan corpses. The fact is mentioned by Maurice Bessy and again by Pauwels and Bergier, who set the actual number of bodies at a thousand. They wore German uniform, but without the usual insignia of rank.

The religion of Tibet is Buddhism, but like the Zen of Japan, it is a brand of Buddhism far divorced from the Indian original. Many scholars prefer the term “Lamaism” to distinguish between Tibetan Buddhism and its parent root. The religious life of the country is concentrated in a multitude of monasteries, many of them built in almost inaccessible mountain regions. Side by side with the state religion of Lamaism, and flourishing particularly in the rural districts, is Tibet’s aboriginal religion of Bon. The Bon-Pas follow a primitive, animistic creed, full of dark rituals and spells. If the holy Lamas of the Buddhist sects were looked on as personifications of spiritual wisdom, the priests of Bon had a potent reputation with the common people as magicians.

The Nazi leaders were attracted to Tibet by those of its secret doctrines which filtered through to the west. They believed, those members of the Thule group, the Luminous Lodge, and the various other occult organizations which helped shape the Third Reich, in an esoteric history of mankind. And it was in the archives of Tibetan monasteries that this history was preserved in its purest form.

Already, in the latter half of the previous century, intriguing hints about Tibetan secret teachings had been carried to the west by Helena Blavatsky, who claimed initiation at the hands of the Holy Lamas themselves. Blavatsky taught that her “Hidden Masters” and “Secret Chiefs” had their earthly residence in the Himalayan region. As soon as the Nazi movement had sufficient funds, it began to organize a number of expeditions to Tibet and these succeeded one another practically without interruption until 1943. One of the most tangible expressions of Nazi interest in Tibet was the party`s adoption of its deepest and most mystical of symbols-the swastika.

The swastika is one of mankind’s oldest symbols, and apart from the cross and the circle, probably the most widely distributed. It is shown on pottery fragments from Greece dating back to the eighth century BC. It was used in ancient Egypt, India and China. The Navaho indians of North America have a traditional swastika pattern. Arab-Islamic sorcerers used it. In more recent times, it was incorporated in the flags of certain baltic states.

The idea for the use of the swastika by the Nazis came from a dentist named Dr. Friedrich Krohn who was a member of the secret Germanen order. Krohn produced the design for the actual form in which the Nazis came to use the symbol, that is reversed, spinning in an anti-clockwise direction. As a solar symbol, the swastika is properly thought of as spinning, and the Buddhists have always believed the symbol attracted luck. The Sanskrit word “svastika” means good fortune and well being. According to Cabbalistic lore and occult theory, chaotic force can be evoked by revers- ing the symbol. And so the symbol appeared as the flag of Nazi Germany and the insignia of the Nazi party, an indication for those who had eyes to see, as to the occult nature of the Third Reich.

The Controversy off the Occult ReichBy John Roemer
One hundred years after Adolf Hitler’s birth near Linz in Austria on April 20 1889, and decades after his malign empire metastasized in Bavaria in Bavaria, the Hitler phenomenon remains to mainstream historians largely inexplicable, or at least unexplained. The man and his awful work seem to stand outside history looking in. Perhaps our human fear of the irrational is so great that we instinctively hold Hitler at a great remove in order that we need not admit him to our company.

In light of this it isn’t very surprising that an extensive literature exists seeking an occult rationale for the otherwise baffling catastrophe Hitler represents. As Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier point out in the Morning of the Magicians(1960), the Nazi era simply defies conventional analysis:

A self taught madman, surrounded by a handful of megalomaniacs,rejects Descartes, spurns the whole humanist culture, tramples on reason, invokes Lucifer, conquers Europe, and nearly conquers the world. The historian begins to feel anxious and to wonder whether his art is viable.

Pauwels and Bergier were among the first postwar proponents of a black magical explanation for the Third Reich. About a quarter of their book is devoted to a region they call “The Absolute Elsewhere,” a neverland where Nazi pseudosciences and occult methodology held official sway. They quote a Hitlerian pronouncement to demonstrate that the Fuhrer’s intellectual development was on a level wholly different from that understood by the Western tradition: “there is a Nordic and National Socialist science which is opposed to Jewish-Liberal science”.2 Reality was defined by politics.

Nazi “science” has brought hoots of derision from those who hold to the Cartesian model. In place of psychology there was an occult frappe composed of the mysticism of Gurdijeff, the theosophy of Madame Blavatsky and the archetypes of Nordic mythology. In place of Newtonian physics stood the cosmic force called vril, the bizarre geology known as the hollow earth theory, and the frigid cosmology of Hans Horbiger’s Welteislehre, the doctrine of eternal ice.

Nazi thought excluded psychoanalysis, which has in fact been not very helpful in explaining the etiology of great evil, although Robert G.L. Waite’s effort, quoted above and published in 1977 by Basic Books, is good on several provocative subjects: Hitler’s sadomasochistic sex life; the possibility he had a Jewish grandfather; and his Viennese mentors, who are described at greater length by the authors about to be mentioned.

Nazism officially rejected the theory of relativity as “Jewish science”. Not only Freud but Einstein too was forced to flee Hitler’s Europe. He and other physicists eventually were able to ensure that atomic secrets remained in the hands of the allies until they could be used spectacularly to climax the Pacific war.

Horbiger’s physics derived from an intuitive flash he experienced late in the nineteenth century. ” As a young engineer,” he wrote, “I was watching one day some molten steel poured on wet ground covered with snow: the ground exploded after some delay and with great violence.”

This conflict of opposites, of fire and ice, is a theme that inspired Horbiger and resonated for German nationalists because it recurs in the Icelandic Eddas, the sourcebooks of Teutonic mythology. It all makes good sense in Iceland, since that island’s peculiar geology feature numerous volcanic rifts in the permafrost; fire and ice are commonly juxtaposed all over the landscape. As grounds for a cosmology- the word implies universality- it is at best dubious. It would be a hard sell in Hawaii.

Nevertheless, Nazi science was influential out of all proportion to its objective validity. Hoerbiger was immensely influential in the Third Reich. His followers numbered in the tens of thousands. There were scores of Horbigerian books, hundreds of Welteislehre pamphlets, and a monthly magazine called The Key to World Events.

Unfortunately, Hitler never inventoried his books, and the only detailed accounting of his libraries comes courtesy of the former United Press correspondent Frederick Oechsner, who met Hitler repeatedly and was evidently able to acquaint himself intimately with the FŸhrer’s book collections. “I found that his personal library, which is divided between his residence in the Chancellery in Berlin and his country home on the Obersalzberg at Berchtesgaden, contains roughly 16,300 books,” Oechsner wrote in his best-selling book This Is the Enemy (1942).

According to Oechsner, the biggest single share of Hitler’s library, some 7,000 books, was devoted to military matters, in particular “the campaigns of Napoleon, the Prussian kings; the lives of all German and Prussian potentates who ever played a military role; and books on virtually all the well-known military campaigns in recorded history.”

Another 1,500 volumes concerned architecture, theater, painting, and sculpture. “One book on the Spanish theater has pornographic drawings and photographs, but there is no section on pornography, as such, in Hitler’s Library,” Oechsner wrote. The balance of the collection consisted of clusters of books on diverse themes ranging from nutrition and health to religion and geography, with “eight hundred to a thousand books” of “simple, popular fiction, many of them pure trash in anybody’s language.”

By his own admission, Hitler was not a big fan of novels, though he once ranked Gulliver’s Travels, Robinson Crusoe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and Don Quixote (he had a special affection for the edition illustrated by Gustave DorŽ) among the world’s greatest works of literature.

The one novelist we know Hitler loved and read was Karl May, a German writer of cheap American-style westerns. In the spring of 1933, just months after the Nazis seized power, Oskar Achenbach, a Munich-based journalist, toured the Berghof in the FŸhrer’s absence and discovered a shelf of Karl May novels at Hitler’s bedside. “The bedroom of the FŸhrer is of spartan simplicity,” Achenbach reported in the Sonntag Morgenpost. “Brass bed, closet, toiletries, a few chairs, those are all the furnishings. On a bookshelf are works on politics and diplomacy, a few brochures and books on the care of German shepherds, and then pay attention you German boys! Then comes an entire row of books by Karl May! Winnetou, Old Surehand, Bad Guy, all our dear old friends.” During the war Hitler reportedly admonished his generals for their lack of imagination and recommended that they all read Karl May. Albert Speer recounted in his Spandau diaries,

Hitler was wont to say that he had always been deeply impressed by the tactical finesse and circumspection that Karl May conferred upon his character Winnetou … And he would add that during his reading hours at night, when faced by seemingly hopeless situations, he would still reach for those stories, that they gave him courage like works of philosophy for others or the Bible for elderly people.

No one knows the exact extent of Hitler’s library. Though Oechsner estimated the original collection at 16,000 volumes, Gassert and Mattern assert that it is impossible to determine the actual dimensions, especially since the majority of the books were either burned or plundered in the final weeks of the war an assumption confirmed in part by Florian Beierl, the head of the Archive for the Contemporary History of the Obersalzberg, in Berchtesgaden.

According to Beierl, Hitler’s Berghof experienced successive waves of looters: first local residents, then French and American soldiers, and eventually members of the U.S. Senate. Beierl showed me archival film footage (taken by the legendary World War II photographer Walter Rosenblum) of a delegation of American senators Burton Wheeler, Homer Capehart, and Ernest McFarland emerging from the Berghof ruins with books under their arms. “I doubt if they were taking them to the Library of Congress,” Beierl said.

I have also been told that a portion of the Hitler Library may have been seized by the Red Army. “Stalin was so paranoid about Hitler that he sent trophy brigades to search for anything connected with him,” says Konstantin Akinsha, a former researcher for the Presidential Advisory Commission on Holocaust Assets in the United States. “His skull, his uniforms, Eva Braun’s dresses, her underwearÑthey are all in Moscow.” Akinsha told me recently that in the early 1990s he heard rumors about a depository in an abandoned church in Uzkoe, a suburb of Moscow, that allegedly contained a huge quantity of “trophy books,” including some that had belonged to Hitler.

Grigory Kozlov, another “trophy” sleuth, confirms that a “secret depository” did indeed exist in Uzkoe for more than four decades, with tens of thousands of books stacked from floor to ceiling. “At the beginning of 1995 there was a big discussion about trophy books,” Kozlov told me. “They decided to remove these books from Uzkoe and destroy all traces that showed there had been some sort of secret depository there.” Now, he says, the books have been dispersed anonymously in libraries and archives across Russia. “I don’t know what’s true or not,” Kozlov told me. “Books were evacuated without records, confiscated without records. I don’t know if anyone is ready to talk.”

The 1,200 of Hitler’s books in the Library of Congress most likely represent less than 10 percent of the original collection. Nevertheless, when I first visited the Hitler Library, in April of 2001, I was surprised to discover that despite the incompleteness of the collection, I could easily discern the collector preserved within his books. In more than 200 World War I memoirs, including Ernst JŸnger’s Fire and Blood, with a personal inscription to “the FŸhrer,” I encountered Hitler the “Austrian corporal,” with his bushy moustache, his somber demeanor, and his battlefield service, during which he was twice wounded and for which he was twice decorated, once with the Iron Cross first class.

In two olive-drab paperbacks, guidebooks to the cultural monuments of Brussels and Berlin, published by Seemann Verlag and costing three marks each, I glimpsed Hitler the aspiring Frontsoldat-cum-artist. The Berlin guide has Hitler’s signature in faded purple ink on the inside front cover, with the place and month of purchase: “Fournes, 22 November 1915.” In the Brussels guide Hitler simply scrawled “A. Hitler” in pencil; the last three letters trail downward like unspooling ribbon. A chapter on Frederick the Great is especially worn, its pages tattered, marked with fingerprints, and smeared with red candle wax. Tucked in the crease between pages 162 and 163 I found a three-quarter-inch strand of stiff black hair.

In dozens of books, with salutations from the likes of Prince August Wilhelm son of the last German Kaiser and the heirs of the Bechstein piano dynasty, I saw Hitler the protŽgŽ of Germany’s financial, social, and cultural elite. One book on FŸhrertum “leadership” was presented to Hitler by the industrialist Fritz Thyssen, who had introduced him to some of Germany’s leading businessmen at a decisive meeting in DŸsseldorf in January of 1932.

“To the FŸhrer, Adolf Hitler, in memory of his presentation to the DŸsseldorf Industrial Club,” Thyssen wrote on the inside cover. Several books are inscribed to Hitler from Richard Wagner’s youngest daughter, Eva, who had married Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Chamberlain was an anti-Semitic Englishman best known for his book The Foundations of the 19th Century, in which he advanced the thesis that Jesus was of Aryan rather than Semitic blood. Hitler read Chamberlain during his Vienna period, and had a brief audience with the aging anti-Semite at the Wagner estate shortly before being sent to Landsberg Prison. “You know Goethe’s differentiation between force and force,” Chamberlain wrote Hitler in October of 1923. “There is force which comes from chaos and leads to chaos, and there is force which is destined to create a new world.” Chamberlain credited Hitler with the latter.

In a French vegetarian cookbook with an inscription from its author, Ma•a Charpentier, I encountered Monsieur Hitler vŽgŽtarien. And I found hints of Hitler the future mass murderer in a 1932 technical treatise on chemical warfare that explores the varying qualities of poison gas, from chlorine to prussic acid (BlausŠure). The latter was produced commercially as Zyklon B, which would be notorious for its use in the Nazi extermination camps.

I also found, however, a Hitler I had not anticipated: a man with a sustained interest in spirituality. Among the piles of Nazi tripe (much of it printed on high-acid paper that is rapidly deteriorating) are more than 130 books on religious and spiritual subjects, ranging from Occidental occultism to Eastern mysticism to the teachings of Jesus Christ books with titles such as Sunday Meditations; On Prayer; A Primer for Religious Questions, Large and Small; Large Truths About Mankind, the World and God.

Also included were a German translation of E. Stanley Jones’s 1931 best seller, The Christ of the Mount; and a 500-page work on the life and teachings of Jesus, published in 1935 under the title The Son: The Evangelical Sources and Pronouncements of Jesus of Nazareth in Their Original Form and With the Jewish Influences. Some volumes date from the early 1920s, when Hitler was an obscure rabble-rouser on the fringe of Munich political life; others from his last years, when he dominated Europe.

One leather-bound tome with WORTE CHRISTI, or “Words of Christ,” embossed in gold on the cover was well worn, the silky, supple leather peeling upward in gentle curls along the edges. Human hands had obviously spent a lot of time with this book. The inside cover bore a dedication: “To our beloved FŸhrer with gratitude and profound respect, Clara von Behl, born von Jansen von den Osten. Christmas 1935.”

Worte Christi was so fragile that when the attendant brought it to me, he placed it on a red-velvet pad in a wooden reading stand, a beautifully finished oak contraption with two supports that could be adjusted with small brass pegs to fit the dimensions of the book. No more than a foot wide and eighteen inches long, the stand had a sacred air, as if it belonged on an altar.

I reviewed the table of contents “Belief and Prayer,” “God and the Kingdom of God,” “Priests and Their Religious Practices,” “The World and Its People” and skimmed the introduction; then I scanned the book for marginalia that might suggest a close study of the text. A white-silk bookmark, preserved in its original perfection between pages 22 and 23 (only the portion exposed to the air had deteriorated), lay across a description of the Last Supper as related by Saint John. A series of pages that followed contained only a single aphorism each: “Believe in God” (page 31), “Have no fear, just believe” (page 52), “If you believe, anything is possible” (page 53), and so on, all the way to page 95, which offers the solemn wisdom “Many are called but few are chosen.”

On page 241 appears the passage “You should love God, your Lord, with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your spirit: this is the foremost and greatest commandment. Another is equally important: Love your neighbor as you would love yourself.” Beside this passage is one brief penciled line, the only mark in the entire book.

Given Hitler’s legendary disdain for organized religion in general and Christianity in particular, I didn’t expect him to have devoted much time to the teachings of Christ, let alone to have marked this quintessential Christian virtue. Had this in fact been made by the pencil of Hitler’s younger sister, Paula, who occasionally visited her brother at the Berghof and remained a devout Catholic until her dying day? Might some other Berghof guest have responded to this holy Scripture?

Possibly but though most of the spiritually oriented books in the Hitler Library were gifts sent to the FŸhrer by distant admirers, several, like Worte Christi, were obviously well read, and some contained marginalia in Hitler’s hand that suggested a serious exploration of spiritual matters. If Hitler was as deeply engaged with spiritual issues as his books and their marginalia suggest, then what was the purpose of this pursuit?

In the spring of 1943, while the outcome of World War II hung in the balance, the U.S. Office of Strategic Services forerunner to the CIA commissioned Walter Langer, a Boston-based psychoanalyst, to develop a “psychological profile” of Adolf Hitler. As Langer later recalled, this was the first time the U.S. government had attempted to psychoanalyze a world leader in order to determine “the things that make him tick.”

Over the course of eight months, assisted by three field researchers and advised by three other experts in psychology, Langer compiled more than a thousand typewritten, single-spaced pages of material on his “patient”: texts from speeches, excerpts from Mein Kampf, interviews with former Hitler associates, and virtually every printed source available. Langer wrote,

A survey of all the evidence forces us to conclude that Hitler believes himself destined to become an Immortal Hitler, chosen by God to be the New Deliverer of Germany and the Founder of a new social order for the world. He firmly believes this and is certain that in spite of all the trials and tribulations through which he must pass he will finally attain that goal. The one condition is that he follow the dictates of the inner voice that have guided and protected him in the past.

In his summary Langer outlined eight possible scenarios for Hitler’s course of action in the face of defeat. The most likely scenario, he suggested in a prescient moment, was that Hitler’s belief in divine protection would compel him to fight to the bitter end, “drag[ging] a world with us a world in flames,” and that ultimately he would take his own life.

Langer based his assessment not only on Hitler’s repeated references to “divine providence,” both in speeches and in private conversations, but also on reports from some of Hitler’s most intimate associates that Hitler truly believed he was “predestined” for greatness and inspired by “divine powers.” After the war Field Marshal Albert Kesselring, one of Hitler’s chief military advisers, seemed to confirm the Langer thesis. “Looking back,” he said, “I am inclined to think he was literally obsessed with the idea of some miraculous salvation, that he clung to it like a drowning man to a straw.”

Experts since then have been of two minds on the matter of Hitler’s spiritual beliefs. Ian Kershaw argues that Hitler consciously constructed an image of himself as a messianic figure, and eventually came to believe the very myth he had helped to fashion. “The more he succumbed to the allure of his own FŸhrer cult and came to believe in his own myth, the more his judgment became impaired by faith in his own infallibility,” Kershaw writes in The Hitler Myth (1987). But believing in a messianic myth is not the same as believing in God.

When I asked Kershaw in 2001 whether he thought Hitler actually believed in divine providence, he dismissed the notion. “I don’t think that he had any real belief in a deity of any sort, only in himself as a ‘man of destiny’ who would bring about Germany’s ‘salvation,'” he declared. Gerhard Weinberg, who helped sort through the Hitler Library back in the 1950s, likewise dismisses the notion of Hitler as a religious believer, insisting that he was driven by the twin passions of Blut und Boden racial purity and territorial expansion. “He didn’t believe in anything but himself,” Weinberg told me last summer. Most historians tend to agree.

Some non-historians, however, have different views. In the 1960s Friedrich Heer, a prominent and controversial Viennese theologian, identified Hitler as a misguided “Austrian Catholic,” a man whose faith was disastrously misplaced but nevertheless sincere. In a dense, 750-page treatise Heer saw Hitler the Austrian Catholic at every turn: the nine-year-old choirboy catching his first glimpse of a swastika in the coat of arms at the Lambach Monastery; the beer-hall orator whose speeches resound with biblical allusions; the FŸhrer of the Reich who re-created the splendor of the Catholic mass at the annual Nuremberg rally.

Even his virulent hatred of Jewry found sustenance in those roots. Fritz Redlich, an eminent Yale psychiatrist, asserts in his book, Hitler: Diagnosis of a Destructive Prophet, that Hitler acted from a profound belief in God. Noting Hitler’s own words “Man kommt um den Gottesbegriff nicht um” (“You cannot get around the concept of God”), Redlich told me last summer that he was certain Hitler believed in a “divine creature.” He rejected suggestions that Hitler’s invocations of the divine were little more than cynical public posturing and insisted that we ought to take Hitler at his word: “In a way, Hitler was a terrible liar, but he was a tactical liar. In his essential line of thinking he was honest.”

Traudl Junge, Hitler’s former secretary, would not go so far as to say that Hitler believed in God, but she did believe that Hitler’s repeated references to the divine were more than just for show. Junge who died of cancer in February of last year told me the previous summer that Hitler spoke of such things in private as well as in public. After two and a half years of daily contact with Hitler, she was convinced that he believed in some form of divine protection, especially after surviving a dramatic assassination attempt in 1944. “After the July 1944 attack,” she told me, “I believe he felt himself to be an instrument of providence, and believed he had a mission to fulfill.”

Our Nordic ancestors grew strong amidst the ice and snow, and this is why a belief in a world of ice is the natural heritage of Nordic men. It was Austrian, Hitler, who drove out the Jewish politicians, and another Austrian, Horbiger, (who) will drive out the Jewish scientists. By his own example Hitler has shown that an amateur to give us a thorough understanding of the Universe.

Hitler’s fatal confidence in the success of his troops on the Russian front during the 1941 – 2 winter is generally believed to have been a result of his misplaced faith in Horbiger’s weather forecasts. Despite such setbacks, the Welteislehre managed to thrive even after the war. The popular speculations of Immanuel Velikovsky derive in part from Horbiger. In 1953 a survey conducted by Martin Gardner showed that more than a million people in Germany, England, and the U.S. believed that Horbiger was right.

The Horbigerian cosmology posited an early epoch, some fifteen million years ago, during which a hugh moon moved across the sky very near the earth. Its gravitational attraction gave rise to a race of our ancestors, the giants. These giants, which appear in the ancient Norse and Icelandic sagas, sleep, yet they are alive. To the Nazis, they were Supermen. In one set of myths, contained in the Nibelungenlied, they lived beneath Teutonic mountains. In another they were prototype Aryans from the East, inhabiting vast Tibetan caverns.

Three other books that investigate hidden influences on Gerald Suster’s Hitler: The Occult Messiah; Jean-Michel Angebert’s The Occult and the Third Riech and Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke’s The Occult Roots of Nazism.

Suster’s book largely rehashes Pauwels and Bergier. Angebert (actually a pen name for two French writers) interestingly links Hitler to an ancient dualist tradition he traces from Manichaenism in Persia through the Essenes, Jesus’s Palestinian forebears, to the Cathars in the south of France in the Middle Ages. It’s philosophy in which, in its Nazi incarnation, solar forces of light represented by blond, fair-skinned Aryans strive against the evil forces of darkness, who are of course dark skinned Semites.

Both books, but especially Suster’s are written in prose that stops just this side of tabloid journalese. This is too bad for two reasons. One, the authors diminish some important material by this kind of presentation. Two, the lessons we have to learn about mass psychopathology and about the history of fascism are too important to be trivalized in this way.

Goodrick-Clark’s is a serious and compelling historical look at ariosophy, a dangerous amalgam of Aryan racism, pan-German nationalism, and occultism that flourished in Austria and Germany from around 1890 well into the era when Himmler’s Death’s Head SS was organized. Himmler is said by Pauwels and Bergier to have taken the Jesuits for his model, and to have installed a regular hierarchy ranging from lay brothers to father superior, and to have used this Black Order in horrific rites.8

The Occult Roots of Nazismidentifies wide circle of proto-Nazi philosophers, previously almost unknown, who saw in the chaos that beset Germany after the Treaty of Versailles the working out of ancient Aryan prophecies. Among them was Rudolf John Gorsleben, who interesting career Goodrick-Clarke sums up in a sentence: “on the basis of the runes, occultism, and the Edda, Gorsleben created an original racist mystery-religion which illuminated the priceless magical heritage of the Aryans and justified their spiritual and political world-supremacy.”

Gorsleben was active in right-wing politics in Bavaria in the years Hitler was forming his political convictions there, and he lectured to the Thule Society, a Munich club thought to have greatly influenced Nazism in its infancy. He also edited a weekly newspaper called German Freedom; in 1927 he changed the name to Aryan Freedom.

He derived the word ‘race’ from rata, an Old Norse term meaning ‘root’, in order to conclude that God and race were identical. He maintained that racial mixing was always detrimental for the racially superior partner, since his purity was debased in the progeny, and he repeated the common volkisch [folkish] conviction that woman could be ‘impregnated’ by intercourse, even when no conception occurred, so that her subsequent offspring bore the characteristics of her first lover. Given these overwhelming pressures towards the increasing bastardization of the German descendants of the Aryan race, only the strict practice of segregation and eugenics could guarantee the reversal of racial contamination in the world.

Another book which hold that Hitler learned many of his occult lesson from avatars in Vienna and Munich may well be the best known black magical explanation of Nazism to have been put forth so far. Trevor Ravenscroft’s The Spear of Destiny was published by that famous British house of occultism, the aptly named Neville Spearman Ltd,.in 1972, and has since gone through many edition.



Satanists In The Vatican

Satanists In The Vatican

An interesting and disturbing article surfaced recently in the U.K. regarding claims by Father Amorth, a priest/exorcist of noteriety, of Satanists in the very Vatican itself. Fr. Amorth stated clearly that these Satanists occupied positions as high as bishops and cardinals. This coincides perfectly with the stories told by Fr.Malachi Martin. Fr.Martin described in his book A WINDSWEPT HOUSE a Satanic ritual that he claimed in many interviews was based on an actual Satanic cult’s activities within the halls of the Vatican itself. Over the years we have heard such stories of the infiltration of the Roman Catholic Church by such occultists, joined also by Modernists, Gnostics and Socialists. Many traditionalists view the Second Vatican Council and Popes John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II as tools, if not outright engineers, in this scheme to undermine the world’s most recognizable institution of Christianity.

This should be no surprise considering the fact that most world political leaders are members of occult secret societies such as Skull and Bones and Freemasonry, so why would we not expect to find the same thing in an institution so intimately linked with world politics and affairs as the Vatican? Of course the article goes on to offer a rebuttal to Fr.Amorth’s claims from Fr. J. Fortea, another Roman priest/exorcist. The problem is, this is exactly what one would expect. In order to discredit the venerable and traditional minded Fr. Amorth his detractor must be of seemingly equal status. Classic disinformation by muddying the waters.

You can read the full article HERE



Occultism is the study of occult or hidden wisdom (to the occultist, it is the study of “Truth”, a deeper truth that exists beneath the surface). It can involve such subjects as magic, astrology, spiritualism, extra-sensory perception and numerology. There is often a strong religious element to these studies and beliefs, and many occultists profess adherence to religions such as Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Satanism, Luciferianism, Thelema and Neopaganism.

However, the word “occult” is somewhat generic in that almost everything that is not claimed by any of the major religions can be considered the occult. Some religious denominations view the occult as being anything supernatural or paranormal which is not achieved by or through God, and is therefore considered the work of an opposing and malevolent entity, so that the word has negative connotations for many people. It has come to be popularly used to mean “knowledge of the paranormal” (as opposed to science, or the knowledge of the measurable), or “knowledge meant only for certain people” or “knowledge that must be kept hidden”.

It has also become popularly associated (due in part to popular fiction like that of Dennis Wheatley) with Satanism, black magic and divination practices such as necromancy, and also in a general way with mysticism and esotericism. With the publication of “Le Matin des Magiciens” in 1960, various speculative theories about Nazi occultism (the idea that the Nazis were directed by occult agencies of some sort, whether evil forces, invisible hierarchies, unknown superiors, secret societies or even Satan directly) have also become part of popular culture.

Direct insight into, or perception of, the occult does not consist of access to physically measurable facts, but is arrived at through the mind or the spirit, requiring some element of mental, psychological or spiritual training. This often makes use of a “focus”, which may be a physical object, a ritualistic action (e.g. meditation or chanting), or a medium in which one becomes wholly immersed.

The unicursal hexagram is one of the common symbols of modern Thelema 

After centuries of repression by the dominant Christian religion, the study of the occult had a brief revival from the 15th to 17th Centuries, although this was largely halted by the rise of empirical science in the 17th Century. However, towards the end of the 18th Century, the Romantic movement ushered in a new revival of occultism and Western esotericism in Europe as a reaction to the rationalist Enlightenment. The modern German occult revival at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th (including Ariosophy, Armanism and Anthroposophy) and the popularity of Theosophy and Spiritualism provided a renewed driving force behind occultism.

At the beginning of the 20th Century, the English occultist Aleister Crowley developed his Thelema, a religion or philosophy of life based on the rule ” Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”, which he borrowed from the 16th Century French writer François Rabelais. Crowley claimed to have received the “Book of the Law” from an entity named Aiwass in 1904. His system includes ideas from occultism, yoga and both Eastern and Western mysticism, and draws its principle gods and goddesses from Ancient Egyptian religion, including Nuit (the Great Mother, the ultimate source of all things, the night sky arched over the Earth), Hadit (the infinitely small complement and consort of Nuit) and Ra-Hoor-Khuit (a manifestation of Horus, associated with the Sun and the active magical energies). The magic (or “magick”) of Thelema is a system of discipline for physical, mental and spiritual training.